Vibe Coding: AI Assistants and the Future of Work
8
What is the Viqus Verdict?
We evaluate each news story based on its real impact versus its media hype to offer a clear and objective perspective.
AI Analysis:
While the story exposes the current limitations of AI in a significant tech company, the widespread adoption of AI coding assistants is a real trend. The hype around fully autonomous AI coding is overblown, but the underlying technology’s impact will continue to grow, making a score of 8 a reasonable reflection of the story’s real-world implications.
Article Summary
A recent English graduate, eager to explore the burgeoning world of 'vibe coding,' joins the San Francisco-based venture-backed startup Notion as an embedded engineer. Notion's approach, driven by AI assistants like Cursor and Codegen, reflects a growing trend of companies integrating generative AI into their workflows. However, the reality is far from the idealized vision of effortless productivity. The junior engineer quickly discovers that even with AI assistance, challenges remain, particularly in debugging and ensuring the reliability of generated code. The experience highlights the limitations of current AI models, emphasizing the ongoing need for human oversight and iterative refinement. The experiment reveals a shift in the software engineering landscape, where humans and AI collaborate—often with unexpected results. While Notion's cofounders, including Ivan Zhao, envision a future where AI handles routine tasks, the article underscores that human engineers are still crucial for tasks like debugging and ensuring seamless integration. The chaotic process of fixing problems, troubleshooting errors, and ultimately guiding the AI’s output demonstrates the current state of AI’s readiness for complex software development.Key Points
- AI is increasingly integrated into software development workflows, with companies like Notion utilizing assistants like Cursor and Codegen to aid engineers.
- Despite the potential for increased productivity, challenges remain in ensuring the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated code, requiring significant human oversight.
- The experience highlights the ongoing need for human engineers to debug, test, and refine AI-generated code, demonstrating that AI is a tool to augment, not replace, human expertise.

