Musk Sues OpenAI and Apple Over AI Monopoly Claims
8
What is the Viqus Verdict?
We evaluate each news story based on its real impact versus its media hype to offer a clear and objective perspective.
AI Analysis:
The lawsuit’s highly visible nature and Musk’s history of challenging tech giants combined with the significant potential legal and regulatory ramifications ensure substantial long-term impact, even if the legal outcome remains uncertain. The current media buzz reflects the high-profile nature of the parties involved.
Article Summary
Elon Musk’s xAI and its parent company, xCorp, have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Apple, accusing them of manipulating the App Store to favor ChatGPT and maintain an unfair monopoly in the AI chatbot market. The core of the lawsuit centers on Apple’s alleged ‘deprioritization’ of rival AI apps like Grok and X, and the placement of ChatGPT as the sole entry in the ‘Must-Have Apps’ section of the App Store. xAI argues that this strategic placement, coupled with Apple’s smartphone dominance, creates an insurmountable barrier to entry for competing AI companies. The suit highlights the immense user base of iPhones – potentially billions of potential prompts – as a significant advantage for OpenAI. OpenAI spokesperson Kayla Wood dismissed the claims as ‘harassment,’ while Apple maintains its App Store is designed to be unbiased. The legal battle underscores the increasing scrutiny surrounding tech giants' control of the AI landscape and raises questions about potential antitrust violations.Key Points
- Elon Musk’s xAI and xCorp are suing OpenAI and Apple, alleging manipulative practices within the App Store.
- The lawsuit claims Apple is strategically ‘deprioritizing’ rival AI apps like Grok and X to favor ChatGPT.
- xAI argues the iPhone’s massive user base provides an unfair advantage to OpenAI, reinforcing claims of an illegal monopoly.

