ViqusViqus
Navigate
Company
About Us
Contact
System Status
Enter Viqus Hub

Chinese AI Labs Accused of Extensive Distillation Attacks on Anthropic’s Claude

AI Distillation Anthropic DeepSeek MiniMax Moonshot AI Export Controls
February 23, 2026
Source: TechCrunch AI
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
Supply Chain Shock
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

Anthropic is accusing three Chinese AI companies – DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax – of conducting significant distillation attacks targeting its Claude AI model. The accusations center on the labs’ use of ‘distillation,’ a common training method, to replicate Claude’s capabilities. Over 24,000 fake accounts were used to generate 16 million exchanges, specifically targeting Claude’s agentic reasoning, tool use, and coding functionalities. This aggressive approach highlights concerns around illicit access to advanced AI chips and China's efforts to accelerate its AI development. The scale of the attacks, including over 150,000 exchanges from DeepSeek alone, underscores the potential for Chinese AI labs to gain a competitive advantage through stealing American frontier models. This event is unfolding amidst heightened scrutiny of U.S. AI chip exports to China, particularly after recent policy changes allowing companies like Nvidia to sell advanced chips. The attacks further reinforce the arguments for stricter export controls, as Anthropic contends that unauthorized access to sophisticated chips would directly fuel the replication of their cutting-edge models.

Key Points

  • Anthropic accuses DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of using over 24,000 fake accounts to replicate Claude’s capabilities through distillation.
  • The labs generated 16 million exchanges with Claude, targeting its core AI functionalities: agentic reasoning, tool use, and coding.
  • This activity is occurring amid debates over U.S. AI chip exports to China and concerns about the potential for Chinese AI labs to rapidly advance their models.

Why It Matters

This news is significant because it reveals a concerning tactic – systematic intellectual property theft – employed by Chinese AI labs. It elevates the risk beyond simple competition, pointing toward potential national security implications. The accusations underscore the vulnerability of advanced AI models and reinforces the need for robust export controls. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role of AI chips in the global AI race, intensifying the geopolitical stakes. This event isn’t just about Anthropic’s Claude; it’s a symptom of a larger struggle for technological dominance, with potential ramifications for AI safety and regulation worldwide.

You might also be interested in