Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

Altman Dismisses AI’s Water Footprint – A Familiar Debate

OpenAI AI Water Usage Energy Consumption Data Centers ChatGPT Sam Altman
February 21, 2026
Source: TechCrunch AI
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 5
Shifting the Narrative
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 5/10

Article Summary

During a conversation with TechCrunch, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed criticisms surrounding the environmental impact of AI, specifically the water usage and energy consumption associated with models like ChatGPT. Altman swiftly dismissed claims that a single query uses 17 gallons of water, citing outdated data from evaporative cooling systems previously employed in data centers. He emphasized that current concerns focus on total energy consumption, driven by the increasing global use of AI. Altman presented a provocative comparison, arguing that the energy cost of training a human over 20 years is arguably greater than that of querying a trained AI. He framed the discussion as a matter of relative efficiency, rather than an inherent, unmanageable problem. The interview highlights an ongoing debate about the true environmental cost of AI, particularly concerning the vast infrastructure requirements of large language models and the difficulty of accurately quantifying and comparing their impact to human activities.

Key Points

  • Sam Altman refuted claims about ChatGPT using 17 gallons of water per query, citing outdated data centers.
  • He argued that current concerns relate to total energy consumption, not per-query usage.
  • Altman presented a comparison of AI energy use versus the energy required to train a human over 20 years.

Why It Matters

The discussion surrounding AI's environmental impact is gaining increasing urgency, driven by growing concerns about the resource intensity of large language models. Altman's dismissive stance, while perhaps a strategic attempt to diffuse criticism, underscores a key challenge: accurately assessing and comparing the true cost of AI to other industries and human activities. The debate will continue to shape public perception and influence policy discussions around AI development and deployment, particularly as AI models become increasingly integrated into daily life.

You might also be interested in