AI's Em Dash Obsession: A Warning for Human Writers
7
What is the Viqus Verdict?
We evaluate each news story based on its real impact versus its media hype to offer a clear and objective perspective.
AI Analysis:
The impact is significant as it taps into a genuine fear about AI’s potential to erode human creativity. While the hype around AI is currently high, the core issue – the need for human oversight – is a persistent one, driven by realistic concerns about the potential for algorithmic bias and stylistic homogenization.
Article Summary
The article highlights a growing trend – AI’s excessive utilization of em dashes – and its implications for human writing. While AI offers benefits like polishing and rephrasing, its penchant for these dramatic punctuation marks risks transforming communication into something sterile and unnatural. The piece argues that this ‘em-marking’ phenomenon, exemplified by AI’s tendency to insert overly verbose phrases and dramatic pauses, ultimately undermines the genuine, nuanced voice of a human writer. The author uses a humorous, relatable analogy – comparing AI to a child with glitter glue – to illustrate the potential for chaotic overcorrection. The core concern is the erosion of authentic voice and the potential for AI to prioritize form over substance. The article offers practical advice: always write a first draft yourself, carefully strip out AI’s embellishments, and inject your own personality and style back into the text. This cautionary tale serves as a reminder that AI is a tool, not a replacement for human creativity and judgment.Key Points
- AI’s overuse of em dashes is creating a robotic and unnatural writing style.
- Maintaining a human first draft is crucial to preserve a genuine voice and authentic expression.
- Careful editing is necessary to remove AI’s stylistic interventions and restore a natural flow of communication.

