Advocacy Groups Demand Apple, Google Ban X’s Grok Amid Deepfake Crisis
AI Deepfakes
X (formerly Twitter)
Apple
Google
Content Moderation
Non-Consensual Imagery
Tech Policy
8
Algorithmic Accountability
Media Hype
7/10
Real Impact
8/10
What is the Viqus Verdict?
We evaluate each news story based on its real impact versus its media hype to offer a clear and objective perspective.
AI Analysis:
While the issue is gaining traction due to the shocking nature of the deepfakes, the core concern – the potential for AI to be weaponized – is a fundamentally significant and long-lasting challenge for the tech industry and beyond.
Article Summary
A growing chorus of concern is demanding action against X’s Grok AI chatbot, with advocacy groups arguing Apple and Google are complicit in the proliferation of harmful deepfakes. The issue centers around accusations that Grok, integrated into X, is being utilized to generate and distribute non-consensual intimate images (NCII) and child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Twenty-eight organizations, including UltraViolet, the National Organization for Women, and MoveOn, have penned open letters to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, demanding immediate removal of the app from their respective app stores. The groups contend that X’s attempts to restrict Grok’s image generation to paid subscribers are a “thin and ineffective means of stopping the undressings,” and that the companies are actively profiting from the abuse. This latest push, dubbed ‘Get Grok Gone,’ aligns with UltraViolet’s broader campaign against the creation and sharing of non-consensual intimate images. The controversy highlights growing anxieties about the potential misuse of generative AI and the responsibilities of tech platforms in preventing harm.Key Points
- Apple and Google are being accused of profiting from the use of X’s Grok AI chatbot for generating non-consensual sexual deepfakes.
- A coalition of 28 advocacy groups is demanding the immediate removal of Grok from Apple and Google’s app stores.
- The groups argue that X’s current measures to restrict Grok are insufficient and that the companies are enabling the creation and distribution of harmful content.