Thiel's Doomsday Tour: A Schmitt-Girardian Descent
7
What is the Viqus Verdict?
We evaluate each news story based on its real impact versus its media hype to offer a clear and objective perspective.
AI Analysis:
The hype around Thiel’s doomsday obsession is driven by the sheer notoriety of the individual and the inherently unsettling nature of his ideas. However, the long-term impact is likely to be more significant, as his pronouncements—particularly when coupled with his considerable resources—could subtly shape global narratives and potentially influence strategic decisions; a relatively low impact score reflects that.
Article Summary
Peter Thiel, the prolific investor and founder of PayPal and Palantir, is engaging in a series of increasingly bizarre public lectures centered around a doomsday scenario fueled by a complex blend of René Girard’s theology and the apocalyptic theories of Carl Schmitt. These lectures, largely delivered off-the-record, involve a disconcerting return to the ideas of a figure closely associated with the Nazi regime – Schmitt – whose theories often explored the justification for authoritarianism through a lens of crisis and violence. The core of Thiel’s thinking, as revealed through reconstructed accounts and subsequent echoes in his statements, centers on the idea of an ‘Antichrist’ – not a supernatural figure, but rather a manifestation of humanity’s susceptibility to violent, collective delusion when confronted with existential threats. He posits that modern civilization, paralyzed by fear of technological disaster and AI, is creating a fertile ground for this ‘Antichrist,’ a figure who would exploit that fear and offer a seductive, albeit ultimately dangerous, solution. This obsession manifests in a strangely anachronistic reliance on the advice of 64-year-old Austrian theologian Wolfgang Palaver, a longtime Girardian scholar who initially critiqued Schmitt's ideas and who now appears to be the underlying philosophical framework for Thiel’s pronouncements. The repeated invocation of ‘go to church’ represents a surprisingly conservative recommendation, and a stark contrast to Thiel’s previously celebrated embrace of technological innovation and disruptive capitalism. The continued emphasis on this line of thinking—particularly its linkage to Schmitt—suggests a deeply pessimistic assessment of humanity’s capacity for rational decision-making in the face of impending catastrophe.Key Points
- Thiel’s doomsday lectures are primarily informed by the theories of René Girard and, surprisingly, Carl Schmitt, reflecting a complex and somewhat unsettling philosophical approach.
- The core of Thiel’s thinking revolves around the idea of an ‘Antichrist’ – a potential outcome of humanity’s fear of technological collapse and AI, rather than a supernatural entity.
- Thiel’s reliance on the advice of 64-year-old Austrian theologian Wolfgang Palaver, and the repeated insistence on ‘going to church,’ represents a fundamental shift in his public messaging.