Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

Rose’s Rule: EQ, Not Engineering, Drives VC Investment

AI Hardware Venture Capital Kevin Rose Startups Investment Social Acceptability
November 03, 2025
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
Humanity First
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

Kevin Rose, a prominent venture capitalist and early investor in companies like Peloton and Fitbit, is issuing a stark warning to the AI hardware landscape. He’s advocating for a fundamental shift in how venture capital firms approach investment, emphasizing emotional resonance and social acceptability alongside technical prowess. Rose’s “punch in the face” rule—a metaphor for rejecting investments in AI hardware that feel intrusive or poorly conceived—highlights the crucial role of human connection in the success of wearable technology. He believes the current AI wearables push, characterized by relentless data collection and an ‘always-on’ mentality, is flawed. Rose’s experience with the failed Humane AI pendant demonstrates this perfectly – an argument fueled by a genuine disagreement with his wife. This isn’t a rejection of AI itself, but a critique of its application and the potential for it to create uncomfortable or ill-considered social interactions. Rose’s perspective is particularly relevant as AI rapidly integrates into everyday life, raising complex ethical questions about privacy, trust, and the human experience. He is effectively arguing that the future of successful ventures lies not just in brilliant technology, but in founders who can tap into these human dimensions.

Key Points

  • Emotional resonance and social acceptability are now paramount for AI hardware investment.
  • Venture capital firms should prioritize founders with strong emotional intelligence and a willingness to take bold risks.
  • Technical capabilities alone are insufficient; the human element—specifically, the potential impact on social dynamics—must be considered.

Why It Matters

This analysis carries significant implications for the future of AI hardware investment and, more broadly, the trajectory of AI development. Rose’s perspective forces a critical examination of the ‘shiny object’ syndrome that often drives innovation – the tendency to invest in new technologies simply because they are novel, without considering their potential social and psychological impact. For professionals in tech, finance, and venture capital, it serves as a valuable reminder that technology should serve humanity, not the other way around. Understanding this nuanced perspective is crucial for navigating the increasingly complex ethical landscape of AI, ensuring that innovation aligns with societal values.

You might also be interested in