Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

Naming the New Reality: The Confusion Surrounding AI Glasses

AI Glasses Augmented Reality Smart Glasses XR Meta Ray-Ban Google Project Aura Tech
December 10, 2025
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
Shifting Sands
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

The rise of smart glasses, particularly those incorporating AI, has triggered a significant naming crisis in the wearable tech industry. No single term – ‘smart glasses,’ ‘AI glasses,’ ‘AR glasses,’ or ‘XR glasses’ – seems to fully encapsulate the diverse range of devices emerging. From Google’s Project Aura, which uses ‘AI glasses’ for some products, to Xreal’s categorization of its products as ‘AR glasses,’ and even the broader use of ‘XR glasses,’ the lack of a unified framework is creating confusion for both consumers and industry experts. Gartner, Counterpoint Research, and IDC offer varying definitions, further complicating the landscape. Most notably, the traditional divisions between virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) are blurring as form factors become more flexible. Companies are increasingly defining these devices based on usage patterns - whether they're designed for constant, 24/7 wear (like ‘AI glasses’) or for more episodic, task-oriented use, like headsets. This ambiguity highlights a fundamental shift: the future of wearable tech isn’t simply about the technology itself, but about how and when we’ll actually use it.

Key Points

  • The industry lacks a consistent naming convention for AI-powered glasses, leading to confusion among consumers and experts.
  • Different companies (Google, Xreal, etc.) employ varying terms – ‘AI glasses,’ ‘AR glasses,’ ‘XR glasses’ – with no clear consensus.
  • Device categorization is shifting beyond form factors to focus on usage patterns, with ‘AI glasses’ suggesting constant wear and ‘headsets’ implying episodic use.

Why It Matters

This news is important for anyone involved in the wearable tech industry, including developers, marketers, and investors. The lack of a standardized terminology creates challenges for product development, marketing, and consumer understanding. As this category continues to grow, establishing clear definitions will be crucial for driving adoption and shaping the future of these devices. The evolving taxonomy represents a larger trend: the technological landscape is becoming increasingly complex and nuanced, requiring a deeper level of understanding and strategic thinking.

You might also be interested in