Foundation Models: The Rise of the Wrapper

Article Summary

Recent trends in the AI startup landscape reveal a significant shift away from the pursuit of creating entirely new, ultra-large foundation models. Instead, companies are increasingly focused on tailoring existing models – like GPT, Claude, and Gemini – for specific tasks and building user interfaces on top of them. This approach, highlighted at the Boxworks conference, reflects a recognition that the early scaling benefits of pre-training have largely run their course, leading to diminishing returns. The proliferation of open-source alternatives and the ability to easily swap between different models further erode the competitive advantage of building a massive foundation model from scratch. Several key voices, including a16z’s Martin Casado, have pointed to the lack of a durable ‘moat’ in the AI technology stack, suggesting that the initial hype surrounding foundation models was overblown. While companies like OpenAI and Anthropic still hold considerable advantages – brand recognition, infrastructure, and massive cash reserves – the core strategy of simply building bigger and bigger models is losing its appeal. The immediate future appears to be dominated by discrete AI applications, interface design, and fine-tuning of existing models.

Key Points

• The early scaling benefits of pre-training have diminished, making massive foundation models less appealing for startups.
• The rise of open-source alternatives and the ease of model swapping are reducing the competitive advantage of creating new foundation models.
• A lack of a ‘moat’ in the AI technology stack suggests that building the largest model isn't a sustainable competitive strategy.