Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

Beyond Optimization: Eudaimonic Rationality as the Key to AI Alignment

AI Alignment Eudaimonia Rationality Artificial Intelligence Ethics Value Theory Agency
February 18, 2026
Source: The Gradient
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 9
Re-Calibrating Alignment
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 9/10

Article Summary

This analysis explores a novel approach to AI alignment, arguing that conventional optimization strategies are fundamentally flawed. The core argument posits that human rationality isn't driven by ‘goals’ but by aligning actions with practices – networks of actions, action-dispositions, and evaluation criteria that inherently promote themselves. The author, drawing on philosophical traditions, advocates for ‘eudaimonic rationality,’ a system mirroring human flourishing through practices, rather than imposing a rigid, extrinsic optimization target like ‘human flourishing.’ This framework views rationality as a dynamic process of reflective equilibration within a valued practice, akin to a mathematician striving for ‘mathematical excellence’ by continually promoting that excellence. The essay highlights the ‘type mismatch’ between Effective Altruism-style optimization and eudaimonic rationality, suggesting that AI agents interpreting values through a goal-oriented lens would struggle to understand the complexities of human values. Crucially, the argument emphasizes the ‘naturalness’ of eudaimonic rationality, suggesting it’s a robust and stable approach, potentially mirroring the inherent coherence and evolutionary trajectory of both biological and artificial agents. This approach is critical for safe and effective AI alignment.

Key Points

  • Human rationality isn't driven by goals, but by aligning actions with practices – networks of actions and evaluation criteria that promote themselves.
  • Eudaimonic rationality – mirroring human flourishing through practices – offers a more stable and coherent framework for AI alignment compared to goal-oriented optimization.
  • A ‘type mismatch’ between Effective Altruism-style optimization and eudaimonic rationality creates significant challenges for AI alignment, highlighting the inherent differences in value interpretation.

Why It Matters

This research is highly relevant for the ongoing debate surrounding AI safety and alignment. The existing focus on creating AI agents that maximize pre-defined outcomes, often framed as ‘human flourishing,’ is susceptible to misinterpretation and failure. The eudaimonic rationality model offers a deeper, more nuanced understanding of human agency, potentially providing a more robust and resilient approach to AI alignment. For professionals in AI safety, this challenges conventional thinking and suggests a shift towards designing AI systems that understand and participate in the dynamic, self-promoting practices that drive human flourishing, rather than attempting to simply dictate it.

You might also be interested in