Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

Autodesk Sues Google Over ‘Flow’ AI Videomaker Name

AI Autodesk Google Trademark Legal Technology AI Software
February 10, 2026
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
Brand Wars Begin
Media Hype 7/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

Autodesk, a leading 3D design software company, has filed a lawsuit against Google, arguing that Google’s naming of its AI-powered video generator, ‘Flow,’ infringes on Autodesk’s existing ‘Flow’ brand. The lawsuit, filed in California, claims the overlap in branding could confuse customers and undermines Autodesk’s established products, including Flow Studio, which uses AI to create 3D scenes from live-action footage. Autodesk initially requested Google cease using the ‘Flow’ name following the launch of Google’s Flow app in May 2025. Google reportedly responded by planning to market the product as ‘Google Flow.’ The legal battle centers around Autodesk’s assertion that the name confusion is already occurring, with some users mistakenly referring to Google’s product as ‘Flow Studio.’ Autodesk is seeking a court order to block Google from using the ‘Flow’ trademark and seeking damages. This case highlights the growing concern over brand protection in the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-powered creative tools.

Key Points

  • Autodesk is suing Google over the name ‘Flow’ for Google’s AI video generator.
  • Autodesk claims the name overlap could confuse customers with its existing ‘Flow’ products.
  • The lawsuit seeks a court order to block Google from using the ‘Flow’ trademark.

Why It Matters

This lawsuit is significant as it represents a proactive stance by Autodesk to protect its brand in the increasingly competitive field of AI-powered creative tools. It raises broader questions about intellectual property rights and brand protection in the context of rapidly developing AI technologies. The case has implications for other companies utilizing similar branding strategies and could set precedents for future legal disputes within the AI sector. For professionals in tech, legal, and creative industries, this case underscores the importance of careful brand management and proactive IP protection.

You might also be interested in