Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact

AI Artist Record Deal: A Copyright Mess

AI Copyright Music Entertainment Legal Artificial Intelligence Record Labels
September 25, 2025
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
Algorithm Ambiguity
Media Hype 7/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

Record company Hallwood Media recently signed a deal with Telisha “Nikki” Jones, whose AI-generated R&B artist, “Xania Monet,” has garnered significant attention on Spotify and Instagram. The core issue revolves around the copyrightability of music generated by AI systems like Suno. Legal experts confirm that current copyright laws primarily protect works with demonstrable human authorship. In Monet’s case, the music itself was produced using Suno, and without a clear human contribution beyond the lyrics written by Jones, the music lacks copyright protection. However, Hallwood Media’s deal highlights the potential for securing copyright on the human-made element—the lyrics—a common practice in music contracts. The deal underscores a broader ‘unsettled’ legal landscape surrounding AI and creative works, particularly concerning the training data used by AI music generators. Concerns are mounting about copyright holders’ ability to track and prevent their music from being used to train these models. Hallwood Media’s actions are seen as potentially dubious, given the lack of clear copyright protection for the underlying music. The situation underscores the need for legal frameworks to adapt to this rapidly evolving technology. As of September 2025, no copyright registrations exist for “Telisha Jones” or “Xania Monet,” further emphasizing the legal ambiguity.

Key Points

  • AI-generated music lacks automatic copyright protection unless human authorship is demonstrably present.
  • Record companies can potentially secure copyright on human-created elements like lyrics within a music contract.
  • The legal landscape surrounding AI-generated creative works is currently ‘unsettled,’ posing challenges for copyright enforcement.

Why It Matters

This story matters because it directly addresses the intersection of rapidly advancing AI technology and established copyright law. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative industries – particularly music – the ability to protect intellectual property is paramount. This case raises fundamental questions about ownership, responsibility, and the future of creative work in an age where machines can mimic human artistry. For professionals in the music industry, legal teams, and technology developers, this situation highlights the urgent need for updated regulations and frameworks to navigate this complex legal terrain. The implications extend beyond just music; it sets a precedent for how other forms of creative content – art, writing, film – might be treated in the future.

You might also be interested in