Viqus Logo Viqus Logo
Home
Categories
Language Models Generative Imagery Hardware & Chips Business & Funding Ethics & Society Science & Robotics
Resources
AI Glossary Academy CLI Tool Labs
About Contact
Back to all news ETHICS & SOCIETY

Google's AI Overload Drives User to a User-Focused Search Engine

search engine AI Google Kagi privacy technology consumer search
August 05, 2025
Viqus Verdict Logo Viqus Verdict Logo 8
User Revolt
Media Hype 6/10
Real Impact 8/10

Article Summary

The article chronicles a user's increasingly negative experience with Google's evolving search engine, which is now dominated by AI-generated summaries and demonstrably incorrect results, particularly on technical topics. The author expresses frustration with Google’s shift towards prioritizing AI “hallucinations” over factual accuracy, echoing concerns about the diminishing quality of search results. The piece highlights the feeling of being treated as a product, rather than a customer, as Google relentlessly pushes AI-driven content. This transition is mirrored by the author’s use of Kagi, a subscription-based search engine. Kagi’s focus on accuracy, transparency, and a user-centric approach, funded by user subscriptions rather than venture capital, offers a compelling alternative. The article emphasizes Kagi’s commitment to avoiding fabricated results and its utilization of a Privacy Pass standard, showcasing a focus on user privacy and trust. The author contrasts Kagi with other popular search engines, like DuckDuckGo and Bing, criticizing their reliance on other companies’ indexes or a feeling of outdated, corporate design. The growing trend of AI-driven search is framed as a threat to genuine information access, and Kagi represents a pushback against this model.

Key Points

  • Google's AI-driven search results are increasingly unreliable and filled with ‘hallucinations’.
  • Users are feeling like they are being treated as products, rather than customers, with Google prioritizing AI over factual accuracy.
  • Kagi offers a user-centric, subscription-based alternative that focuses on accuracy and transparency, funded by users, not venture capital.

Why It Matters

This article speaks to a broader trend of user dissatisfaction with the increasing dominance of AI in essential online services. It highlights the potential dangers of prioritizing algorithmic ‘innovation’ over human-centric design and a commitment to truth. The story matters because it taps into a growing concern about the quality of information and the control exerted by large tech companies. It’s relevant to anyone who values reliable information and is wary of the potential for bias, manipulation, or simply incorrect results when searching online. This situation has wider implications for the future of search and how we interact with information in a digital age.

You might also be interested in